Navigating skincare studies can feel overwhelming, but they are your roadmap to informed choices. Let’s unpack the clinical study for X’Factor Face Cream to show how to read results while highlighting its promising findings.

The study tested 33 participants (n=33) over 28 days (t=28d). The sample size, n=33, is modest—common in brand-led trials due to resource limits—but sufficient for initial insights if well-executed. A 28-day duration matches the skin’s renewal cycle, ideal for spotting early changes, though extended studies (e.g., 12 weeks) better confirm lasting benefits.

X’Factor’s results are compelling: a 13.59% increase in firmness, 9.22% reduction in under-eye wrinkle volume, 7.05% reduction in under-eye wrinkle area, 3.89% decrease in crow’s feet volume, and 4.13% decrease in crow’s feet area. These averages suggest noticeable improvements, particularly in firmness and under-eye wrinkles. However, without standard deviation or confidence intervals, we cannot fully gauge consistency across participants—did everyone improve similarly, or did some see bigger gains?

The p-value (p<0.05) is a strong point: it indicates a less than 5% chance the results were random, lending credibility to X’Factor’s effectiveness. While statistical significance doesn’t guarantee dramatic visible changes (e.g., a 4% crow’s feet reduction may be subtle), the reported metrics are encouraging for a 28-day trial.

To evaluate further, consider asking: Was the study double-blind with a control group? Were measurements objective (e.g., via 3D imaging)? (yes we did!) Did participants vary in skin type or age?

X’Factor’s study provides a solid foundation, showcasing evidence-based results that make it a standout choice. Use these same rigorous questions to evaluate any claims by any brands in the future to make your own informed decision. By understanding these metrics, you can confidently add X’Factor to your routine, knowing its science-backed benefits align with realistic skincare goals.